five.  Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for that complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping tablets on fourteen.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has long been developed before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected inside the liver although not within the abdomen. Consequently, the recovery of claimed sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel with the complainant have also argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of the motorcycle.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment on the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that whilst the crime of murder was founded, the offender had a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case set a precedent for taking into consideration mitigating factors during sentencing.

Note: Please fill any field and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave industry blank.

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided with the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion with the employer. However, there may very well be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the appropriate forum. Read more

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government businesses in regards to projects that could possibly pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all future public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found from the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.

whether while granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

department concerned shall deliver the complete set of ACRs in the concerned officer to DPC perfectly in advance cases for promotin(Promotion)

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is often justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is put in its place.

Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation of your Pakistani legal website system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is crucial for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and selling transparency.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling around the same kind of case.

A reduced court may well not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it can be unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may well both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts on the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, when observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have detrimental effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out from the 1992 Rio Declaration within the Environment and Enhancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.